<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revised Planetary Mnemonic Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tleaves.com/2006/08/25/revised-planetary-mnemonic-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tleaves.com/2006/08/25/revised-planetary-mnemonic-update/</link>
	<description>Creativity x Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterb</title>
		<link>http://tleaves.com/2006/08/25/revised-planetary-mnemonic-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>peterb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tleaves.com/?p=676#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>As discussed by the Château-école du Pierre research team (see &lt;em&gt;Tracking Anomaly JAN-1, a Methodological Analysis&lt;/em&gt;, Royal Sir Myles na gCopaleen Astronomical Society Press, Dalkey, 1976), Interplanet Janet&#039;s comet team &lt;em&gt;travels with her&lt;/em&gt;.  If anything, they are satellites of Janet.  That being said, Janet herself, being a galaxy girl, has intentionality and freedom of motion, and thus is not &quot;in orbit&quot; around our Sun.  Considering them to be &quot;planets&quot; is thus obviously wrong, as well as potentially insulting to our visiting Solar System Ms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As discussed by the Château-école du Pierre research team (see <em>Tracking Anomaly JAN-1, a Methodological Analysis</em>, Royal Sir Myles na gCopaleen Astronomical Society Press, Dalkey, 1976), Interplanet Janet&#8217;s comet team <em>travels with her</em>.  If anything, they are satellites of Janet.  That being said, Janet herself, being a galaxy girl, has intentionality and freedom of motion, and thus is not &#8220;in orbit&#8221; around our Sun.  Considering them to be &#8220;planets&#8221; is thus obviously wrong, as well as potentially insulting to our visiting Solar System Ms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackmire</title>
		<link>http://tleaves.com/2006/08/25/revised-planetary-mnemonic-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackmire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tleaves.com/?p=676#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Professor Berger, do you propose then, to include, the entirety of &quot;her comet team&quot; as planets?  And how are we to know which planets are part of her team?  Isn&#039;t it true, in face, Professor Berger, that you have a personal financial interest in the trans-neptunian bodies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Berger, do you propose then, to include, the entirety of &#8220;her comet team&#8221; as planets?  And how are we to know which planets are part of her team?  Isn&#8217;t it true, in face, Professor Berger, that you have a personal financial interest in the trans-neptunian bodies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
