Tea Leaves

Saying it's "inhumane" will probably garner them more sales from pudding-brained lobster-anthropomorphising morons, than they'd get from realist bastards like ourselves by stating that live lobsters loose money.

I could care less about lobster, but WFM was the only company who signed a major wind power contract during the 10 months that Congress allowed the 1.8 cent/kwh renewable subsidy to lapse, and for that they have by business for a long time.

I remember asking for chilean sea bass at the fish counter in Whole Foods and getting, instead, a big lecture about how I shouldn't eat that. As if I haven't heard. So I bought it at Wholey's. I actually don't see why this sort of sanctimony wins sales. If I wanted to feel like a better person I certainly wouldn't get my validation from a bunch of sanctimonious pricks. cf fair trade coffee!

A friend once told me the story about how they asked for baby formula at Whole Foods and was lectured about how they really should be breastfeeding instead. I mean, there's really no amount of profanity adequate enough to address that attitude.

But did you hear about Whole Foods's new local food initiatives? Sounds like a good thing. http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/6/29/143121/559

I don't know why you don't buy soft shell crabs at Wholey's in the strip. Wholey's have had crabs for the past month. Soft shell crabs are a seasonal item, so you can't get good crabs all the time.

I would think Benkovitz also carries soft shell crabs, if you like the more preppy environment there.

That said, I think the Whole Foods ban is also stupid.

Benkovitz and Wholey's both (I think) only get crabs that have been pre-cleaned and are therefore shipped dead. My experience is that these are distinctly inferior compared to crabs that are still alive when you buy them.

Karen says Wholey sometimes has live crabs but it's hit and miss. We haven't used them for a long time because we've gotten product of questionable freshness in the past. Maybe we'll look again.

In the Tea Leaves world, when a merchant stands up for healthy kids and sustainable fishing, and instructs their employees to try to educate customers about those issues if asked -- the employee deserves profanity to "address their attitude"?

Please don't ever hire anyone. And if you guys ever run for office, please remind me to vote for the other candidate.

A merchant deserves profanity if he attempts to "educate" customers (or, rather, impose their own specific political agenda) instead of doing what being a merchant is all about: selling goods.

It's hugely inappropriate for a grocery store employee to lecture a customer on breastfeeding-vs-formula. In addition to the sheer rudeness of it, how on earth does the employee possibly have enough information to be providing informed childcare / medical advice here?

Sure, breastfeeding is almost always better for the child, but *almost* is a key word -- there are exceptions, and people who for whatever reason cannot breastfeed really do not need busybodies, no matter how good their intentions may be, lecturing them about how they feed their children.

Also, have you heard some of the rants people get about breastfeeding? What you're characterizing as "stand[ing] up for healthy kids" often actually gets delivered as a sanctimonious "You know, you might as well be blowing smoke into the baby's face if you're going to abuse it by using formula, you terrible terrible parent".

I don't know, guys. By avoiding Whole Foods Market on these grounds, it seems like you're wasting a golden opportunity for entertainment. For example:

You: Hi, I'd like a two pounds of Chilean sea bass.

WFM: I'm sorry, sir, we don't carry Chilean sea bass because it's overfished, and natural stocks are dangerously low. Are you sure you don't want something else?

You: No, I want only Chilean sea bass. What you probably don't know, friend, is that the Chilean-sea turret worm, a magnificent species of sea worm that is millions of years old and whose secretions have recently been shown to be the mother ocean's primary means of holding deadly algal blooms in check, is on the verge of extinction because of predation by its only known enemy, the toothfish -- commonly known as Chilean sea bass. Friend, don't you see? If we don't *reduce* the Chilean sea bass population, we could very well lose the turret worms altogether!

WFM: (stunned silence)

I have known many women who, for one reason or another, either could not breastfeed at all, or needed to supplement their breast milk with formula.

Andy B is right that an employee with the temerity to lecture one of these women on "breast milk good, formula bad" (which was what the employee in question actually said) does not deserve profanity. What they actually deserve is to have a sippy cup shoved up their ass.

I "like" how Whole Foods feels that it needs to wax sanctimonious on the "humane" treatment of foodstuffs while at the same time denying its employees the right to unionize.

Now I'm confused. With rants like these, why does *anyone* bother to shop at Whole Foods?

You've been away from Pittsburgh too long. Whole Foods can get almost infinitely bad and *still* be better than Giant Eagle.

To the breast-fed zealots:
I was allergic to breast milk when I was a baby, but thankfully at that time stores weren't quite as full of self-righteous pricks like you to lecture my mother about why she shouldn't buy me formula. Moreover, I encountered none of the "problems" non-breastfed babies are supposed to have (yes, all my vitriol occurred in adulthood :). So, here's a big F you to that.

Secondly, while I agree that there are plenty of worse places than Whole Foods, and I could care less about buying live bugs, the lecture aspect of the place can certainly be irritating if you let it get to you. The marketing tricks disguised as "helpful information" are ridiculous. Whole Foods doesn't really care about us all the way some people seem to believe it does. It's a corporation, folks! This ain't Ma and Paw on the farm telling you the plain truth. Do you think the WF execs actually can't sleep at night thinking about the treatment of their bugs? As psu suggested, it's probably expensive to ship them and they don't sell well. The annoying part is that WF can frame it in a mushy way that is supposed to make us cheer for how concerned and responsible they are. What a bunch of hooey.

Ya, I have given up on Wholey's. Too many things have had serious freshness problems.

If you don't want to deal with shipping for "softies", then you can always make a road trip. Any excuse to get the hell out of PIT is a good excuse.

Andy B is exactly the kind of mind numbled robot that WF is counting on. What about all the little cute birdies, and bald eagles that are turning into feathered spam by these rotating avian-o-matics?

You should talk to people that have applied to work at WF. The reason why the employees of WF think the have the right, nay, the *DUTY* to lecture the hoi polloi is they truely believe they are the chosen ones. Never has the ego of someone being paid $10/hr to stack veggies been so great.

WF is a cult.

soybaby: It may be for PR reasons that Whole Foods does X, but I don't really care so long as X is a good thing (not that I give a rat's ass about the feelings of arthropods). Now, if they cared about buying produce that was actually fresh instead of stuff that looks fresh because it was in a CO2-enriched truck for a week, that would make me happy.